When the Anthropology Career Readiness Network (ACRN) brought its Departmental Advisory Initiative (DAI) to California State University, Northridge (CSUN), it initiated a structured and collaborative effort to assess and strengthen how the department prepares its students for professional success beyond graduation. Over several days, faculty, staff, and students engaged in guided discussions, reflective exercises, and strategic assessments aimed at advancing the department’s long-term commitment to career readiness.
As both an ACRN intern and a CSUN anthropology undergraduate student, I attended the initiative to observe the process and offer a student perspective. From the beginning, the department’s level of engagement was striking. I observed during the sessions that all of the department seemed encouraged and energized to revamp the program. Students expressed a sense of optimism by seeing their department take clear steps to improve support for their future careers.
A notable aspect of the DAI process at CSUN was the use of carefully designed materials that ACRN facilitators Elizabeth Briody and Jennifer Studebaker had developed. Their opening presentations contextualized national workforce trends such as the growing emphasis on soft skills across industries, the expanding importance of interdisciplinary problem-solving, and the ways anthropology aligns with emerging sectors in technology, health, nonprofit work, and public service. They also emphasized that employers increasingly value adaptable, communication-oriented workers who can navigate diverse environments—areas where anthropologists are particularly well-prepared. These insights helped frame the broader relevance of the initiative.
The facilitators introduced discussion prompts such as “What connections does the department currently have that can connect students with job opportunities?” and “How would hosting a networking luncheon look so students can get acquainted with environments different from academia?” By encouraging faculty to consider these questions, the facilitators helped generate practical ideas for strengthening student engagement with applied contexts. They also provided structured worksheets that helped participants think concretely about anthropological competencies and how the curriculum cultivates them. These tools established a shared framework that allowed faculty and students to engage in focused, productive dialogue.
One of the most revealing moments occurred during a department-wide exercise called the SWOT analysis. This exercise encouraged faculty to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with clarity and honesty. I noticed how faculty members reflected on strengths they had forgotten, weaknesses they did not consider, opportunities they had unknowingly neglected to share with students, and threats they had not previously recognized. The process brought to the surface a wide range of insights and laid the groundwork for discussions about future improvements.
Throughout the visit, Briody and Studebaker emphasized practical ways to integrate career readiness into departmental practices. Their approach made the concept both understandable and applicable. As I reflected afterward, they made career readiness feel tangible. I also came to realize the hundreds of careers I could pursue, as well as the resources already available in my department. Other students shared similar reactions, noting how the facilitators helped them see the relevance of anthropological skills in a wider professional landscape.
The DAI process also illuminated areas to strengthen the curriculum. Many participants acknowledged that coursework often leans heavily toward theory and would benefit from a more intentional integration of applied skills. What stood out, however, was the department’s willingness to address these gaps. The faculty expressed a genuine commitment to refining course content, improving communication with students, and ensuring the curriculum remains responsive to the changing job market. Reflecting on the experience, I felt that it boosted my confidence to see my instructors try hard to refresh the program—and it expanded my own confidence moving forward.
For universities considering participation in the DAI, CSUN’s experience illustrates the initiative’s ability to generate meaningful, evidence-based reflection and to guide departments toward clearer strategic goals. I encourage other institutions to know that bringing strengths to the forefront helps better serve students and offers them a sense of conviction in finding a future career path in anthropology. I would emphasize that encouraging student participation further enhances the process by ensuring that departmental planning reflects the needs and perspectives of those most directly affected.
Ultimately, CSUN’s engagement with the DAI reinforced its commitment to student success and highlighted the continued relevance of anthropology in an evolving professional environment. The experience strengthened connections among faculty, students, and staff, and it provided a clear and promising direction for enhancing the department’s long-term impact.
The post What is a student’s perspective on ACRN’s efforts to build career readiness at California State University, Northridge (CSUN)? appeared first on The Anthropology Career Readiness Network.